[内容请查看原文]
引言
大肠埃希菌(E. coli)在人类和宠物的急性感染中发挥重要作用,包括胃肠道感染和肠外感染(Tchesnokova等,2016)。肠外致病性大肠埃希菌(ExPEC)的致病型可根据系统发育群归属和毒力因子组合分为不同的亚致病型,如尿路致病性大肠埃希菌(UPEC)、禽致病性大肠埃希菌(APEC)和脓毒症相关大肠埃希菌(SPEC)等(Hutton等,2018)。由ExPEC引起的感染包括尿路感染(UTIs)、脓毒症、肺炎、脑膜炎、皮肤和软组织感染以及骨髓炎(Hutton等,2018)。泌尿生殖道感染是据报道在犬中最常诊断的感染性疾病,UPEC在人类和动物的UTIs中占大多数(Kidsley等,2020;Aurich等,2023)。UPEC的致病性源于其毒力机制,使其能够在膀胱上皮细胞中定植和增殖(Kidsley等,2020)。这包括菌毛黏附素,最常见的是1型菌毛,这是一种细胞外蛋白结构,使UPEC能够附着于膀胱细胞(Whelan等,2023;Lüthje和Brauner,2014)。Ristow和Welch(2016)将α-溶血素描述为人类UTIs严重病例中常见的毒力因子,溶血素的表达与感染严重程度之间存在相关性。α-溶血素(HlyA)(由hlyCABD操纵子编码)引起红细胞裂解,并对多种物种和细胞类型表现出细胞毒活性。使用全细胞、红细胞、人工膜和脂质双分子层进行的大量生化、电生理和结构研究已充分证明HlyA在大肠埃希菌中的成孔作用。实验数据一致表明,HlyA插入靶细胞膜,形成明确的跨膜孔道。这一作用因靶细胞膜完整性丧失而导致细胞裂解。关键的是,包括孔道尺寸、电导特性和成孔精确过程在内的详细机制已通过这些实验得到充分表征(Ristow和Welch,2016)。Ristow和Welch指出,约50%的UPEC编码HlyA。然而,随着感染严重程度的增加,表达HlyA的菌群比例也随之增加,在由UPEC引起的肾盂肾炎病例中,编码HlyA的比例高达78%(Ristow和Welch,2016)。此外,大肠埃希菌分离株中的hlyA基因也与伴侣动物的UTIs相关(Ksiezarek等,2021;Siqueira等,2009;Siqueira等,2021;Melo等,2022;Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020)。因此,本研究旨在分析从有UTIs症状的犬和猫尿液样本中分离的、在绵羊血琼脂上具有溶血活性的大肠埃希菌。
[内容请查看原文]
材料与方法
2017年至2023年间,在维也纳兽医大学微生物研究所的诊断活动中,共收集了51株溶血性大肠杆菌分离株。所有这些临床样本均来自第三方,因此不受维也纳兽医大学伦理与动物福利委员会报告义务的约束。分离株以冷冻保护培养基保存于−80°C,以供进一步鉴定。分离株来源于患有泌尿生殖道感染的犬(n = 32)和猫(n = 19)的尿液样本,主要为膀胱炎(n = 15),其次为血尿(n = 10)和排尿困难(n = 6)(表1和表S1)。分离株在5%绵羊血琼脂上重新培养,DNA使用Sigma‐Aldrich(Sigma‐Aldrich by Merck kGaA,达姆施塔特,德国)的GenEluteTM哺乳动物基因组DNA小量制备试剂盒按照制造商说明进行提取。抗菌药物敏感性试验按照CLSI标准(临床和实验室标准协会,2018)采用琼脂纸片扩散法进行。大肠杆菌ATCC 25922作为质量控制。使用含以下抗菌药物的纸片:氨苄西林(10 µg);头孢噻肟(30 µg);头孢他啶(30 µg);头孢西丁(30 µg);美罗培南(10 µg);庆大霉素(10 µg);妥布霉素(10 µg);阿米卡星(30 µg);环丙沙星(5 µg);甲氧苄啶–磺胺甲噁唑(1.25/23.75 µg);四环素(30 µg);氯霉素(30 µg);磷霉素(200 µg);以及呋喃妥因(300 µg)(Becton Dickinson;海德堡,德国)。由于DNA微阵列面板中不含这些基因,对四环素或氯霉素耐药的分离株进一步采用PCR检测tet(A)和tet(B)或cat耐药基因的存在(Grünzweil等,2021年5月31日)。对环丙沙星耐药分离株的gyrA和parC喹诺酮耐药决定区(QRDR)进行PCR扩增并测序(Everett等,1996)。分离株采用先前描述的四重赋值法进行系统发育分型(Clermont等,2013年2月)。大肠杆菌分离株的克隆群通过双位点序列分型确定,即结合fumC和fimH序列数据(“CH‐克隆分型”)(Weissman等,2012),使用基因组流行病学中心(https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/chtyper/,于2025年10月1日访问)托管的CHTyper(Roer等,2018)。除克隆分型外,对一株表现出独特特征(即ESBL表型)且属于CH40‐30的分离株,进行了七位点多位点序列分型(MLST)(Wirth等,2006)和等位基因特异性PCR,以鉴定大肠杆菌O25b克隆(Clermont等,2009)。使用INTER‐ARRAY(INTER‐ARRAY by fzmb GmbH,巴特兰根萨尔察,德国)的定制DNA微阵列技术,按照制造商说明(Monecke等,2007;Bernreiter‐Hofer等,2021)测定了一组毒力相关基因(表S2)。对氨苄西林耐药或表现出ESBL表型的分离株,使用INTER‐ARRAY基因分型试剂盒CarbaResist(INTER‐ARRAY by fzmb GmbH;巴特兰根萨尔察,德国;所有信息可应要求于https://www.inter‐array.com/products/获取)进一步分析。整合到INTER‐ARRAY基因分型试剂盒CarbaResist阵列中的所有耐药相关基因均如先前所述(原CarbDetect AS‐2)(Braun等,2018)。
TABLE 1. Summarised molecular characterisation, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence profile of the E. coli isolates investigated.
| Resistance profile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolates | Host | Diagnosis | Phylo‐group | CH‐clonotyping | Virulence genes | Phenotype | Genotype |
| 1430, 1431 | Cat | Dysuria | B2 | 24‐102 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 1355 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 14‐1463 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | AMP, STX | bla TEM , bla OXA‐2 , sul2 , dfrA5 |
| 1619 | Cat | Chronic kidney disease | B2 | 14‐2 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1319, 1594 | Dog | Haematuria (1319), cystitis (1594) | B2 | 43‐1561 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2164 | Cat | Haematuria | B2 | 52‐286 | cnf1, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 2428 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐1431 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2455, 4160, 3157 | Dog | Pyelonephritis (2455), cystitis (4160), haematuria (3157) | B2 | 103‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2712 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 103‐1629 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | AMP | bla TEM |
| 2790 | Cat | Not known | B2 | 13‐223 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2771 | Cat | FLUTD | B2 | 13‐5 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2721, 3616 | Dog | Not known (2721), cystitis (3616) | B2 | 103‐9 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1177, 3617 | Dog | Cystitis (1177), not known (3617) | B2 | 13‐9 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 970 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 13‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 959 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 24‐306 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 747 | Cat | Dysuria | B2 | 14‐10 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 350 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐2 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 189 | Cat | Pyelonephritis | B2 | 14‐9 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 325 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 13‐2 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 607 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 13‐223 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 726 | Cat | Chronic kidney disease | B2 | 43‐new | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3710 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐new | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3841, 3843 | Cat | Acute kidney disease (3841), cystitis (3843) | B2 | 24‐13 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 3850 | Cat | FLUTD | B2 | 103‐102 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 14,057 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 38‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 8 | Cat | Haematuria | B2 | 103‐21 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3699 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 24‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3068 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 24‐10 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 4143 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐new | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 4154 | Dog | Prostatitis | B2 | 103‐9 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 473 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐21 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2181 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 13‐102 | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2484 | Dog | Irregular bladder wall | B2 | 13‐27 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2623 | Dog | Dysuria | B2 | 4‐13 | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 2714 | Dog | Haematuria | B1 | 103‐32 | cnf1, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | AMP, TET, STX | bla TEM, bla ACT , tet (A), dfrA5 |
| 3248 | Dog | Incontinence | B2 | 103‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | AMP, TET, STX | bla TEM , aad A1 , tet (A), sul1, sul2 , dfrA1, dfrA5 |
| 3679 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 24‐204 | cnf1, f17‐G, fimH, K88ab, hlyA | AMP, CHL, STX | bla TEM , sul2, cat |
| 703 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 103‐new | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1009 | Dog | Dysuria | B2 | 13‐211 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 494 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 319‐306 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1306 | Dog | Bacteriuria | B2 | 24‐197 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3000 | Cat | Dysuria | B2 | 14‐197 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 4207 | Cat | FLUTD | B2 | 14‐103 | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3383 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 40‐30 | fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | AMP, CTX, CAZ, CIP, TET, GEN, FOF | bla CTX‐M15 , bla ACT , bla OXA‐2 , tet (A), dfrA5, aac(3')‐IVa, aadA1 |
[内容请查看原文]
结果
51株分离株中有45株对所有受试抗菌药物敏感。在其他分离株中,观察到对氨苄西林(n=1)、氨苄西林、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲噁唑和四环素(n=2),或氨苄西林、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲噁唑和氯霉素(n=1)的耐药性。一株分离株表现为ESBL表型,对ẞ-内酰胺类(不包括头孢西丁和碳青霉烯类)、环丙沙星(在gyrA的QRDR中检测到氨基酸替换(83Ser→Leu和87Asp→Asn)以及在parC中(80Ser→Ile 84Glu→Val))、四环素、庆大霉素和磷霉素耐药。四株分离株为多重耐药(Sweeney et al. 2018)(表1)。检测到的耐药基因(bla TEM, bla CTX, bla OXA-2, sul1, sul2, dfrA1, dfrA5, tet(A), aac(3')-IVa, catA)与表型结果高度一致(表1)。51株大肠杆菌中有50株属于系统发育群B2,一株分离株被归入系统发育群B1。共区分出34种CH克隆型。CH103-9为优势克隆型(n=7),同时出现频率较高的两株分离株(CH24-102(n=2);CH43-1561(n=2);CH13-223(n=2);CH13-5(n=2);CH13-9(n=2);CH24-13(n=2);CH38-9(n=2))显示出克隆相关性。一株属于B2-CH40-30的分离株对O25b特异性等位基因呈阳性,并通过七位点MLST确认为ST131。通过微阵列检测,所有分离株均显示毒力因子fimH(51/51)和hlyA(51/51)。毒力因子cnf1(50/51)、pic(15/51)、papC(11/51)和iucD(11/51)也经常被检测到,其中papC和iucD共出现。
[内容请查看原文]
讨论
本研究旨在利用表型和基因分型方法,对从患有泌尿系统感染的犬和猫样本中分离的溶血性大肠杆菌进行特征分析。迄今为止,与奥地利猫和犬尿路感染病例相关的大肠杆菌已被广泛表征(Loncaric et al. 2020; Marques et al. 2016)。
在本研究中,除一株分离株外,其余均属于B2系统发育群。来自人和动物尿路的埃希菌分离株,尤其是引起ExPEC感染的分离株,通常与该系统发育群相关(Aurich等,2023;Siqueira等,2021;Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020;Osugui等,2014;Oh和Park,2025;Johnson等,2009)。除hlyA外,所有分离株中均观察到黏附基因fimH,该基因被认为是UPEC的主要毒力相关基因(VAG)(Terlizzi等,2017)。与既往描述伴侣动物UPEC相关VAG的研究一致,除一株分离株外,其余均观察到毒素编码基因cnf1,而pic基因(编码丝氨酸蛋白酶)、iucD基因(仅见于有毒力的埃希菌菌株)和papC(编码P菌毛)则频繁检出(Aurich等,2023;Ksiezarek等,2021;Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020;Osugui等,2014;Johnson等,2009;Zogg等,2018)。尽管B2系统发育群占优势是预期之中的,但cnf1与hlyA的连锁在该地理队列中完全保守,为UPEC的区域性克隆稳定性提供了新的见解。其他VAG则较少观察到,如astA(编码肠聚集性耐热毒素EAST1,通常但并非仅与肠聚集性埃希菌(EAEC)相关),或K88菌毛(又称F4菌毛)和f17-G菌毛。这与其他研究一致(Jousserand等,2025;Johnson等,2009)。一株来自B1系统发育群的分离株显示出与UPEC特异性VAG的关联。虽然B1系统发育群埃希菌通常被认为是健康人和动物肠道中的共生菌株(Oh和Park,2025),但偶尔也可从伴侣动物的尿路感染中分离到(Aurich等,2023;Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020;Osugui等,2014;Oh和Park,2025;Johnson等,2009;Zogg等,2018)。
在本研究中,抗生素表型和基因型耐药较为罕见。虽然大多数分离株(88.2%)对所有受试抗生素敏感,但六株分离株中有四株呈现多重耐药谱(Sweeney等,2018)。犬和猫UPEC分离株(主要属于B2系统发育群)中这一较低的抗生素耐药率与既往研究中观察到的耐药情况一致(Aurich等,2023;Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020;Zogg等,2018)。检出的一株分离株(3383,表现为ESBL表型)属于B2(系统发育型)-O25b(血清型)-ST131(序列型)-CH40-30(克隆型),携带bla CTX-M-15和bla OXA-2,并表现为环丙沙星耐药,这一孤立观察值得关注。B2-O25b-ST131克隆被认为是与人类相关的主要“高风险”大流行病原体,普遍被归类为ExPEC和/或UPEC,可导致人和动物的多种感染,包括尿路感染(Jousserand等,2025;Clark和Maresso,2021;Rogers等,2011;Nicolas-Chanoine等,2014;Bonnet等,2021;Pitout和Finn,2020)。迄今为止,在奥地利动物中,B2-O25b-ST131克隆已从奥地利动物中散在检出,包括野生动物(Loncaric等,2013)、犬前列腺(Loncaric等,2020)、猪肠道相关样本(Bernreiter-Hofer等,2021),以及最近从一份粪便样本中检出(Saria等,2025)。除属于埃希菌克隆复合群(CC)131的B2-O25b-ST131-CH40-30外,本研究中检出的其他克隆型也见于近期研究的UPEC中。这些包括属于埃希菌CC12的CH13-27和CH13-223,属于CC73的CH24-9、CH24-10、CH24-13、CH24-102和CH24-1431;属于CC127的CH14-2;属于CC141的CH13-5;最后是属CC372的CH103-9(Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020;Oh和Park,2025;Zogg等,2018)。虽然属于CC131、CC73、CC12和CC141的埃希菌分离株已被报道为常从人类中分离(Manges等,2019;Emery等,2023;Riley,2014),但属于CC372的分离株主要与犬相关(Aurich等,2023;Jousserand等,2025;Valat等,2020)。
本研究存在若干局限性。首先,由于仅限于溶血性埃希菌,我们的分析存在固有的选择偏倚;因此,引起尿路感染的非溶血性菌株的毒力和耐药潜力有待进一步研究。其次,所选VAG组合有限。未来的研究可通过纳入更大的菌株集合并利用全基因组测序进行更全面的表征来丰富这些数据。最后,耐药分离株的检出率较低,限制了对犬和猫尿路感染中抗菌药物耐药的更广泛流行病学认识。
[内容请查看原文]
结论
尽管大多数分离株对所有受试抗生素敏感,但这些菌株的毒力潜力对公共卫生和动物健康均构成相关关切。因此,这些分离株导致人类感染或定植的风险仍有待完全确定。在临床背景下,我们的数据表明,伴侣动物中相当比例的大肠杆菌尿路感染仍可通过现有抗生素疗法治愈。然而,具有人畜共患潜力的多重耐药宠物大肠杆菌菌株的存在,凸显了持续采取“同一健康”方法监测和控制其毒力及抗菌药物耐药性的迫切需求。
作者贡献
Sarah Büttner:形式分析、调查、可视化、撰写——原始草案准备。Joachim Spergser:资金获取、资源、方法学、撰写——审阅与编辑。Olga Makarova:数据管理、方法学、验证、撰写——原始草案准备、撰写——审阅与编辑。Michael P. Szostak:数据管理、调查、验证、撰写——审阅与编辑。Adriana Cabal Rosel:调查、方法学、撰写——审阅与编辑。Werner Ruppitsch:调查、方法学、撰写——审阅与编辑。Sabine Schäfer‐Somi:资源、验证、撰写——审阅与编辑。Elke Müller:形式分析、调查,Sascha D. Braun:调查、方法学、撰写——审阅与编辑。Stefan Monecke:概念化、方法学、撰写——审阅与编辑。Ralf Ehricht:概念化、资源、方法学、撰写——审阅与编辑。Frank Künzel:概念化、调查、资源、验证、撰写——审阅与编辑。Igor Loncaric:概念化、形式分析、调查、方法学、监督、验证、可视化、撰写——原始草案准备、撰写——审阅与编辑。
资金
作者无需要报告的内容。
伦理声明
所有样本均来自第三方,因此不受维也纳兽医大学伦理与动物福利委员会报告义务的约束。
支持信息
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
查看英文原文▾
[内容请查看原文]
Introduction
Escherichia (E.) coli plays a significant role in acute infections in humans and pets, both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal (Tchesnokova et al. 2016). The pathotype of extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) can be divided into different subpathotypes, such as uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC), and sepsis‐associated E. coli (SPEC), among others, based on phylogenetic group affiliations and a combination of virulence factors (Hutton et al. 2018). Infections caused by ExPEC include urinary tract infections (UTIs), sepsis, pneumonia, meningitis, skin and soft tissue infections, and osteomyelitis (Hutton et al. 2018). With infections of the urogenital tract being the reportedly most frequently diagnosed infectious disease in dogs, UPEC causes the majority of UTIs in both humans and animals (Kidsley et al. 2020; Aurich et al. 2023). The pathogenicity of UPEC arises from virulence mechanisms that enable it to colonise and proliferate in the epithelial cells of the bladder (Kidsley et al. 2020). This includes fimbrial adhesins, most commonly Type 1 fimbriae, which are extracellular protein structures that allow UPEC to attach to bladder cells (Whelan et al. 2023; Lüthje and Brauner 2014). Ristow and Welch (2016) describe alpha‐haemolysin as a commonly observed virulence factor in severe cases of UTIs in humans, with a correlation between the expression of haemolysin and the severity of infection. Alpha‐haemolysin (HlyA) (encoded by the hlyCABD operon) causes the lysis of red blood cells and exhibits cytotoxic activity against a variety of species and cell types. Extensive biochemical, electrophysiological, and structural studies using whole cells, erythrocytes, artificial membranes, and lipid bilayers have thoroughly demonstrated the pore‐forming action of HlyA in E. coli. Experimental data consistently show that HlyA inserts into target cell membranes, creating defined transmembrane pores. This action results in the lysis of the target cell due to the loss of its membrane integrity. Crucially, the detailed mechanism, including the dimensions, conductance properties, and precise process of pore formation, has been fully characterised through these experiments (Ristow and Welch 2016). Ristow and Welch indicate that approximately 50% of UPEC encode HlyA. Still, with increasing severity of infection, the proportion of the population expressing HlyA increases, with up to 78% of cases of pyelonephritis caused by UPEC encoding HlyA (Ristow and Welch 2016). In addition, hlyA genes in E. coli isolates were also associated with UTIs from companion animals (Ksiezarek et al. 2021; Siqueira et al. 2009; Siqueira et al. 2021; Melo et al. 2022; Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020). Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse E. coli with haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar isolated from urine samples of dogs and cats with signs of UTIs.
[内容请查看原文]
Materials and Methods
A total of 51 haemolytic E. coli isolates were collected between 2017 and 2023 during diagnostic activities at the Institute for Microbiology of the Veterinary University in Vienna. All these clinical samples were received from third parties and, therefore, are not subject to the reporting obligations of the Ethics and Animal Welfare Commission of the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna. Isolates were stored at −80°C in cryoprotectant medium for further characterisation. Isolates were obtained from urine samples of dogs (n = 32) and cats (n = 19) with infections of the urogenital tract, predominantly cystitis ( n = 15), followed by haematuria (n = 10) and dysuria (n = 6) (Table 1 and Table S1). The isolates were recultivated on 5% sheep blood agar, and DNA was extracted using the GenEluteTM Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep Kits by Sigma‐Aldrich (Sigma‐Aldrich by Merck kGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by agar disc diffusion according to the CLSI standards (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute 2018). E. coli ATCC 25922 served as the quality control. Discs containing the following antimicrobial agents were used: ampicillin (10 µg); cefotaxime (30 µg); ceftazidime (30 µg); cefoxitin (30 µg); meropenem (10 µg); gentamicin (10 µg); tobramycin (10 µg); amikacin (30 µg); ciprofloxacin (5 µg); trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg); tetracycline (30 µg); chloramphenicol (30 µg); fosfomycin (200 µg); and nitrofurantoin (300 µg) (Becton Dickinson; Heidelberg, Germany). Due to the absence of these genes in the DNA microarray panel, isolates showing resistance to tetracycline or chloramphenicol were further tested for the presence of the tet(A) and tet(B) or cat resistance genes using PCR (Grünzweil et al. 2021 May 31). The quinolone resistance‐determining regions (QRDR) of gyrA and parC in ciprofloxacin‐resistant isolates were amplified by PCR and sequenced (Everett et al. 1996). Isolates were phylotyped using the quadruplex assignment method as previously described (Clermont et al. 2013 Feb). Clonal groups of E. coli isolates were determined by two‐locus sequence typing by combining data from fumC and fimH sequences (“CH‐clonotyping”) (Weissman et al. 2012), using CHTyper (Roer et al. 2018) hosted at the Center for Genomic Epidemiology (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/chtyper/, accessed on 1.10.2025). In addition to clonotyping, in an isolate displaying unique characteristics (i.e., ESBL phenotype) and belonging to CH40‐30, seven‐locus multi‐locus sequence typing (MLST) (Wirth et al. 2006) and an allele‐specific PCR were performed to identify the O25b clone of E. coli (Clermont et al. 2009). A set of virulence‐associated genes (Table S2) was determined using a custom‐made DNA microarray‐based technology from INTER‐ARRAY (INTER‐ARRAY by fzmb GmbH, Bad Langensalza, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions (Monecke et al. 2007, Bernreiter‐Hofer et al. 2021). Isolates resistant to ampicillin or displaying an ESBL phenotype were further analysed by the INTER‐ARRAY Genotyping Kit CarbaResist (INTER‐ARRAY by fzmb GmbH; Bad Langensalza, Germany; all information upon request under https://www.inter‐array.com/products/). All resistance‐associated genes integrated into the INTER‐ARRAY Genotyping Kit CarbaResist array were as previously described (formerly CarbDetect AS‐2) (Braun et al. 2018).
TABLE 1. Summarised molecular characterisation, antimicrobial resistance, and virulence profile of the E. coli isolates investigated.
| Resistance profile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Isolates | Host | Diagnosis | Phylo‐group | CH‐clonotyping | Virulence genes | Phenotype | Genotype |
| 1430, 1431 | Cat | Dysuria | B2 | 24‐102 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 1355 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 14‐1463 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | AMP, STX | bla TEM , bla OXA‐2 , sul2 , dfrA5 |
| 1619 | Cat | Chronic kidney disease | B2 | 14‐2 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1319, 1594 | Dog | Haematuria (1319), cystitis (1594) | B2 | 43‐1561 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2164 | Cat | Haematuria | B2 | 52‐286 | cnf1, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 2428 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐1431 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2455, 4160, 3157 | Dog | Pyelonephritis (2455), cystitis (4160), haematuria (3157) | B2 | 103‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2712 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 103‐1629 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | AMP | bla TEM |
| 2790 | Cat | Not known | B2 | 13‐223 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2771 | Cat | FLUTD | B2 | 13‐5 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2721, 3616 | Dog | Not known (2721), cystitis (3616) | B2 | 103‐9 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1177, 3617 | Dog | Cystitis (1177), not known (3617) | B2 | 13‐9 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 970 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 13‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 959 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 24‐306 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 747 | Cat | Dysuria | B2 | 14‐10 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 350 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐2 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 189 | Cat | Pyelonephritis | B2 | 14‐9 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 325 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 13‐2 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 607 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 13‐223 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 726 | Cat | Chronic kidney disease | B2 | 43‐new | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3710 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐new | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3841, 3843 | Cat | Acute kidney disease (3841), cystitis (3843) | B2 | 24‐13 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 3850 | Cat | FLUTD | B2 | 103‐102 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 14,057 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 38‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 8 | Cat | Haematuria | B2 | 103‐21 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3699 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 24‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3068 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 24‐10 | cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 4143 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐new | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 4154 | Dog | Prostatitis | B2 | 103‐9 | cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 473 | Cat | Cystitis | B2 | 24‐21 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2181 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 13‐102 | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2484 | Dog | Irregular bladder wall | B2 | 13‐27 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 2623 | Dog | Dysuria | B2 | 4‐13 | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | NR | |
| 2714 | Dog | Haematuria | B1 | 103‐32 | cnf1, fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | AMP, TET, STX | bla TEM, bla ACT , tet (A), dfrA5 |
| 3248 | Dog | Incontinence | B2 | 103‐9 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | AMP, TET, STX | bla TEM , aad A1 , tet (A), sul1, sul2 , dfrA1, dfrA5 |
| 3679 | Dog | Not known | B2 | 24‐204 | cnf1, f17‐G, fimH, K88ab, hlyA | AMP, CHL, STX | bla TEM , sul2, cat |
| 703 | Dog | Cystitis | B2 | 103‐new | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1009 | Dog | Dysuria | B2 | 13‐211 | astA, cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 494 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 319‐306 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 1306 | Dog | Bacteriuria | B2 | 24‐197 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3000 | Cat | Dysuria | B2 | 14‐197 | cnf1, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 4207 | Cat | FLUTD | B2 | 14‐103 | astA, cnf1, pic, fimH, hlyA | NR | |
| 3383 | Dog | Haematuria | B2 | 40‐30 | fimH, papC, hlyA, iucD | AMP, CTX, CAZ, CIP, TET, GEN, FOF | bla CTX‐M15 , bla ACT , bla OXA‐2 , tet (A), dfrA5, aac(3')‐IVa, aadA1 |
[内容请查看原文]
Results
45 out of 51 isolates were susceptible to all antibiotics tested. Among other isolates, resistance to ampicillin (n = 1), ampicillin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline (n = 2), or ampicillin, trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol (n = 1) was observed. One isolate displayed an ESBL phenotype and was resistant to ẞ‐lactams (exclusive of cefoxitin and carbapenems), ciprofloxacin (amino acid substitutions were detected in the QRDR of gyrA (83Ser→Leu and 87Asp→Asn) and parC (80Ser→Ile 84Glu→Val)), tetracycline, gentamicin, and fosfomycin. Four isolates were multidrug‐resistant (Sweeney et al. 2018) (Table 1). The detected resistance genes (bla TEM, bla CTX, bla OXA‐2, sul1, sul2, dfrA1, dfrA5, tet(A), aac(3')‐IVa, catA) reflected the phenotypic findings well (Table 1). 50 out of 51 E. coli belonged to the phylogenetic group B2, and one isolate was assigned to phylogenetic group B1. Thirty‐four CH clonotypes were differentiated. CH103‐9 was the predominant clonotype (n = 7), along with more frequently occurring two isolates (CH24‐102 (n = 2); CH43‐1561(n = 2); CH13‐223 (n = 2); CH13‐5 (n = 2); CH13‐9 (n = 2); CH24‐13 (n = 2); CH38‐9 (n = 2)) showed clonal relatedness. An isolate belonging to B2‐CH40‐30 was positive for the O25b‐specific allele and confirmed as ST131 using seven loci MLST. All isolates showed the virulence factors fimH (51/51) and hlyA (51/51), determined via microarray. The virulence factors cnf1 (50/51), pic (15/51), papC (11/51), and iucD (11/51) were also frequently detected, with co‐occurrence of papC and iucD.
[内容请查看原文]
Discussion
The present study aimed to characterise haemolytic E. coli isolated from samples of dogs and cats with urinary infections, using pheno‐ and genotyping methods. E. coli associated with UTI cases in Austrian cats and dogs are, until now, widely characterised (Loncaric et al. 2020; Marques et al. 2016).
In the present study, all but one isolate belonged to the phylogroup B2. E. coli isolates from the urinary tracts of humans and animals, particularly those causing ExPEC infections, are often linked to this phylogroup (Aurich et al. 2023; Siqueira et al. 2021; Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020; Osugui et al. 2014; Oh and Park, 2025; Johnson et al. 2009). In addition to hlyA, the adhesion gene fimH, which is referred to as a major virulence‐associated gene (VAG) of UPEC (Terlizzi et al. 2017), was observed in all isolates. Consistent with previous studies describing VAG's associated with UPEC from companion animals, the toxin‐encoding gene cnf1 was observed in all but one isolate, while the pic gene (encoding a serine protease), the iucD gene (which is only found in virulent E. coli strains), and papC (encoding P‐fimbriae) were frequently detected (Aurich et al. 2023; Ksiezarek et al. 2021; Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020; Osugui et al. 2014; Johnson et al. 2009; Zogg et al. 2018). Although the predominance of phylogroup B2 was expected, the complete conservation of the cnf1 and hlyA linkage within this geographical cohort offers novel insights into the regional clonal stability of UPEC. Other VAG's, were infrequently observed, such as astA, which encodes the enteroaggregative heat‐stable toxin EAST1, usually but not exclusively associated with Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), or the K88 fimbriae (also known as F4 fimbriae) and f17‐G fimbriae. This is in concordance with other studies (Jousserand et al. 2025; Johnson et al. 2009). One isolate from the B1 phylogroup revealed associations with UPEC‐specific VAGs. While phylogroup B1 E. coli are typically considered commensal strains in the intestines of healthy humans and animals (Oh and Park 2025), they have been occasionally isolated from UTIs in companion animals (Aurich et al. 2023; Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020; Osugui et al. 2014; Oh and Park 2025; Johnson et al. 2009; Zogg et al. 2018).
Antibiotic phenotypic and genotypic resistance was a rare observation in the present study. While the majority of isolates (88.2%) were susceptible to all tested antibiotics, four out of six isolates displayed a multidrug‐resistant profile (Sweeney et al. 2018). This low antibiotic resistance rate in canine and feline UPEC isolates, mainly belonging to the phylogroup B2, is consistent with the resistance situation observed in previous studies (Aurich et al. 2023; Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020; Zogg et al. 2018). The detection of a single isolate (3383, displaying an ESBL phenotype) belonging to B2 (phylotype) ‐O25b, (serotype) ‐ST131, (sequence type), and ‐CH40‐30 (clonotype), carrying bla CTX‐M‐15 and bla OXA‐2, and exhibiting ciprofloxacin resistance, represents an isolated observation that warrants attention. Recognised as a major human‐associated “high‐risk” pandemic pathogen, the B2‐O25b‐ST131 clone has been universally classified as an ExPEC and/or UPEC and is responsible for various infections in humans and animals, including those with UTIs (Jousserand et al. 2025; Clark and Maresso 2021; Rogers et al. 2011; Nicolas‐Chanoine et al. 2014; Bonnet et al. 2021; Pitout and Finn 2020). Until present, among animals in Austria, the B2‐O25b‐ST131 clone has been sporadically detected from Austrian animals, including wildlife (Loncaric et al. 2013), canine prostate (Loncaric et al. 2020), porcine intestine–associated samples (Bernreiter‐Hofer et al. 2021), and very recently from a faecal sample (Saria et al. 2025). Besides B2‐O25b‐ST131‐CH40‐30, belonging to E. coli clonal complex (CC) 131, other clonotypes detected in the present study have also been observed in UPECs from recent studies. These are CH13‐27 and CH13‐223 belonging to E. coli CC12, CH24‐9, CH24‐10, CH24‐13, CH24‐102, and CH24‐1431 to CC73; CH14‐2 to CC127; CH13‐5 to CC141; and, finally, CH103‐9 to CC372 (Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020; Oh and Park 2025; Zogg et al. 2018). While E. coli isolates belonging to CC131, CC73, CC12, and CC141 have been reported as commonly isolated from humans (Manges et al. 2019; Emery et al. 2023; Riley 2014), isolates belonging to CC372 have been primarily associated with dogs (Aurich et al. 2023; Jousserand et al. 2025; Valat et al. 2020).
This study has several limitations. First, our analysis has inherent selection bias due to restriction to haemolytic E. coli; consequently, the virulence and resistance potential of non‐haemolytic strains causing UTIs require further investigation. Second, the panel of selected VAGs was limited. These data could be enriched in a future study by including a larger collection of strains and utilising whole‐genome sequencing for a more comprehensive characterisation. Finally, the low presence of resistant isolates restricts broader epidemiological insights into antimicrobial resistance within canine and feline UTIs.
[内容请查看原文]
Conclusions
Although the majority of isolates were susceptible to all tested antibiotics, the virulence potential of these strains poses a relevant concern for both public and animal health. Consequently, the risk of human infection or colonisation from these isolates remains to be fully determined. In a clinical context, our data indicate that a significant proportion of E. coli UTIs in companion animals can still be successfully managed with existing antibiotic therapies. Nevertheless, the existence of multi‐drug‐resistant pet E. coli strains with a zoonotic potential underscores the critical need for a continuous “One Health” approach to monitor and control their virulence and antimicrobial resistance.
Author Contributions
Sarah Büttner: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation. Joachim Spergser: Funding Acquisition, Resources, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Olga Makarova: Data Curation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing. Michael P. Szostak: Data Curation, Investigation, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing. Adriana Cabal Rosel: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Werner Ruppitsch: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Sabine Schäfer‐Somi: Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing. Elke Müller: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Sascha D. Braun: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Stefan Monecke: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Ralf Ehricht: Conceptualization, Resources, Methodology, Writing – Review & Editing. Frank Künzel: Conceptualization, Investigation, Resources, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing. Igor Loncaric: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – Original Draft Preparation, Writing – Review & Editing.
Funding
The authors have nothing to report.
Ethics Statement
All samples were received from third parties and, therefore, are not subject to the reporting obligations of the Ethics and Animal Welfare Commission of the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna.
Supporting information
[内容请查看原文]
[内容请查看原文]
兽研