简要概述
尽管锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)已在兽医牙科中用于评估猫颌面部结构和牙齿异常,但针对猫下颌管的综合性多标志点形态计量分析仍然有限。本研究以凡猫为模型,通过对下颌骨全长范围内下颌管走行路径的详细评估来填补这一空白。与以往仅限于孤立区域或单一根尖的犬猫研究不同,本研究采用更广泛的方法,分析了从下颌孔至吻侧颏孔的八个不同解剖标志点,从而获得下颌管走行路径的精确形态计量图谱。最终,这些发现旨在为兽医外科医生提供更完善的解剖学蓝图和临床参考,从而降低猫颌面部关键手术(包括拔牙、牙髓治疗和骨折固定)中神经血管损伤的风险。
关键词:解剖学,锥形束计算机断层扫描,下颌管,形态计量
1. 引言
下颌管(MC)是下颌骨内重要的骨内通道,容纳下牙槽神经血管束,为牙齿、牙龈及邻近软组织提供感觉神经支配和血管供应[1,2]。在食肉动物中,该管起自下颌孔,位于下颌支内侧面、邻近翼窝处,即翼内肌的附着部位[3]。它在下颌体内向吻侧走行,并在犬齿和前臼齿水平经颏孔(吻侧、中间和尾侧/远侧)开口于颊面[3]。
在牙槽外科手术中,精确了解下颌管与邻近牙根之间的空间关系至关重要[4]。口腔颌面部病变在猫的临床实践中非常普遍,其中拔牙是最常实施的外科手术[5]。在拔牙及其他牙髓或肿瘤外科干预过程中,操作不当或解剖学盲区可导致严重的医源性并发症,包括大量出血、下颌骨骨折、牙根/牙齿移位以及永久性神经损伤[6,7,8]。因此,在涉及猫下颌骨的外科手术中,保持下颌管及其神经血管内容物的结构完整性至关重要[9,10,11]。
锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)通过多平面重建(MPR)和三维(3D)建模能力,能够精确显示复杂的颌面部结构和异常[12,13,14]。该技术是一种经过验证的可靠工具,可在手术干预前对下颌管进行亚毫米级空间评估[15,16]。凡猫是原产于土耳其的品种,其特征为三角形头部、小鼻子、全身被白色毛发覆盖,最显著的特征是其独特的眼睛颜色,通常一只眼为蓝色,另一只为浅琥珀黄色[17]。
尽管牙科和颌面外科的大量文献已对人类[18,19]和犬[10,12,20]的下颌骨学进行了描述,但关于家猫或野生猫科动物的类似形态计量研究仍然非常有限[21,22]。虽然CBCT在猫诊断影像学中的应用已在少数研究中有所报道[23,24],但仍缺乏区域下颌骨形态计量的标准化定量基线。在猫科动物中,各种需要外科治疗疼痛性牙科疾病(如牙吸收)可导致严重的颅面功能障碍[6]。因此,手术规划中缺乏详细的解剖学知识会增加严重医源性并发症的风险[11,25]。所以,本研究的主要目的是利用CBCT定量评估雄性和雌性凡猫下颌管的形态计量变异,从而建立品种特异性解剖学基线,以提高猫颌面部手术中的临床安全性。
2. 材料与方法
本研究经当地动物实验伦理委员会批准(决议编号:2026/07-25)。基于高质量锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像,共评估了14只健康成年凡猫(7只雄性,7只雌性)。通过全面体格检查(评估体温、水合状态、黏膜颜色和心肺听诊)以及完整的病史记录(显示无慢性疾病或近期药物干预证据)确认全身健康状况。纳入标准包括完整(未去势/未绝育)成年猫,年龄恰为4岁,平均体重3.3 ± 0.49 kg,无可见解剖学异常或既往手术干预。反之,排除标准包括牙齿发育不完全的幼年个体、老年猫以及任何患有牙齿或牙周疾病的受试者。
为防止运动伪影并确保CBCT采集过程中完全制动,采用了标准化的镇静方案。镇静前分别禁食8小时、禁水3小时,以降低吸入性肺炎风险。通过肌肉注射(IM)盐酸赛拉嗪(剂量为1–2 mg/kg体重;Alfazyne® 2%注射液,Ege Vet Veterinary Medicines,土耳其伊兹密尔)诱导镇静。整个操作过程中监测镇静深度和生命体征。成像前对所有猫进行了全面的口腔检查。CBCT成像使用牙学院配备的扫描仪进行。每只猫俯卧于高度可调的扫描台上,头部伸展至专为该扫描仪设计的碳纤维透射线延伸平台上(图1)。为确保头部对齐的可重复性并尽量减少运动伪影,在颈部下方放置定位泡沫楔,使头部居中于CBCT视野(FOV)内(图1)。
[图:一只梵猫被固定于CBCT机中准备成像。]

所有锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)均使用CS 9600系统(Carestream Dental LLC,美国佐治亚州亚特兰大)采集,下颌视野(FOV)为8 × 5 cm。所有受试者的曝光和采集参数标准化如下:管电压120 kVp,管电流-时间乘积5 mAs,扫描时间7秒,各向同性体素大小0.4 mm。图像分析和形态学评估使用CS 3D Imaging软件(版本3.10,Carestream Dental LLC)进行。形态学测量前,将DICOM数据集传输至专用工作站,并使用多平面重建(MPR)模块(版本3.10,Carestream Dental LLC)重新定向至标准化头部位置。由双侧眶点和耳点定义的Frankfort水平面调整至与地面平行,正中矢状面与面部中线对齐。沿下颌管头尾走向的形态学评估在八个标准化解剖标志点上进行。这些参考标志点的定义和空间位置见图2、图3和图4。
[图:用于下颌管形态学评估的八个横断面标志点的示意图]

[图:用于下颌管形态学测量的八个测量位点(红线)的CBCT矢状面图像。(a]

[图:用于下颌管形态学测量的八个测量位点的CBCT横断面图像。(a)F man]

为确保测量一致性和解剖准确性,所有CBCT评估均由一名接受过诊断影像学培训的经验丰富的兽医完成。在每个预定义的解剖参考标志点记录定量参数,包括下颌管的内部尺寸(图5A)、其相对于外侧皮质边界的空间关系(图5B),以及下颌骨的整体高度和宽度(图5C):
[图:下颌管的形态学测量参数。(A)h:下颌管高度,w:下颌管宽度]

h:下颌管高度(图5A)。
w:下颌管宽度(图5A)。
Flin:下颌管与舌侧边界之间的距离(图5B)。
Fw:下颌管与前庭边界之间的距离(图5B)。
Bh:下颌管至腹侧边界的距离(图5B)。
dep(下颌管深度):从牙槽嵴线至下颌管上界的垂直距离。(图5B)。
Mh(下颌骨总垂直高度):从牙槽嵴最高点至下颌骨基底的距离。(图5C)。
Mw:下颌骨宽度(图5C)。
使用Shapiro–Wilk检验评估连续变量的正态性。由于数据集不服从正态分布,采用非参数统计方法。左右下颌骨之间的配对形态学参数使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析,以评估双侧对称性。性别(雄性与雌性)之间的差异使用Mann–Whitney U检验评估。连续变量以“均值 ± 标准差(SD)”表示。所有统计分析使用SPSS软件(版本21.0;IBM Corp.,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行。双侧p值 < 0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。
3. 结果
形态计量学分析显示,下颌管(MC)高度沿其头尾方向轨迹存在明显的空间变化。在雌性梵猫中,最大MC高度见于下颌孔水平。该高度向第一磨牙近中根方向显著下降,并在至第二前磨牙远中面之前保持相对恒定。随后其向头侧向第一前磨牙近中根方向升高,之后逐渐向与头侧颏孔的连接处变细,该处代表管高度的最小点(表1和表2)。尽管在雄性梵猫中观察到相似的总体趋势,但MC从第一磨牙近中面延伸至第二前磨牙近中面时保持明显更均匀的高度(表1和表2)。
Table 1. Mandibular canal measurement values of female Van cats ( n = 7).
| Measurements | h | w | Fw | Flin | Bh | dep | Mh | Mw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) |
| Right Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.38 ± 0.33 | 2.18 ± 0.15 | 2.20 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.68 ± 0.58 | - | - | 4.39 ± 0.15 |
| RD M1 | 1.93 ± 0.22 | 1.63 ± 0.25 | 1.40 ± 0.16 | 1.50 ± 0.22 | 2.48 ± 1.01 | 5.78 ± 0.25 | 10.19 ± 0.63 | 4.56 ± 0.29 |
| RM M1 | 1.75 ± 0.31 | 1.81 ± 0.21 | 1.60 ± 0.27 | 1.55 ± 0.44 | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 5.93 ± 0.90 | 9.72 ± 0.88 | 4.97 ± 0.36 |
| RD PM2 | 1.78 ± 0.35 | 1.73 ± 0.22 | 1.73 ± 0.43 | 1.38 ± 0.24 | 2.05 ± 0.31 | 5.70 ± 0.82 | 9.53 ± 0.57 | 4.85 ± 0.47 |
| RM PM2 | 2.05 ± 0.41 | 1.65 ± 0.26 | 1.73 ± 0.33 | 1.68 ± 0.62 | 2.33 ± 0.87 | 5.53 ± 0.98 | 9.91 ± 0.66 | 5.07 ± 0.26 |
| RD PM1 | 2.15 ± 0.25 | 1.68 ± 0.29 | 1.65 ± 0.39 | 1.33 ± 0.32 | 1.78 ± 0.37 | 5.85 ± 0.25 | 9.79 ± 0.49 | 4.68 ± 0.48 |
| RM PM1 | 2.35 ± 0.41 | 1.80 ± 0.34 | 1.40 ± 0.14 | 1.03 ± 0.17 | 1.50 ± 0.41 | 6.05 ± 0.87 | 9.90 ± 0.68 | 4.25 ± 0.17 |
| F ment | 0.78 ± 0.19 | 0.81 ± 0.24 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.70 ± 0.62 | 4.65 ± 0.70 | 4.75 ± 0.51 | 10.18 ± 0.30 | 4.53 ± 0.51 |
| Left Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.45 ± 0.33 | 2.25 ± 0.17 | 2.23 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.75 ± 0.62 | - | - | 4.48 ± 1.22 |
| RD M1 | 1.88 ± 0.24 | 1.73 ± 0.28 | 1.53 ± 0.19 | 1.55 ± 0.26 | 2.55 ± 1.07 | 5.68 ± 0.91 | 10.12 ± 0.53 | 4.82 ± 0.28 |
| RM M1 | 1.83 ± 0.36 | 1.85 ± 0.21 | 1.68 ± 0.40 | 1.63 ± 0.41 | 2.15 ± 0.38 | 6.00 ± 0.89 | 9.98 ± 0.61 | 5.15 ± 0.39 |
| RD PM2 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 1.80 ± 0.24 | 1.75 ± 0.44 | 1.45 ± 0.24 | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 5.78 ± 0.85 | 9.68 ± 0.55 | 5.02 ± 0.48 |
| RM PM2 | 2.13 ± 0.34 | 1.70 ± 0.22 | 1.80 ± 0.32 | 1.68 ± 0.55 | 2.38 ± 0.94 | 5.60 ± 1.06 | 10.10 ± 0.66 | 5.20 ± 0.30 |
| RD PM1 | 2.20 ± 0.29 | 1.73 ± 0.26 | 1.70 ± 0.41 | 1.38 ± 0.35 | 1.85 ± 0.31 | 5.90 ± 0.27 | 9.96 ± 0.50 | 4.83 ± 0.47 |
| RM PM1 | 2.34 ± 0.45 | 1.78 ± 0.29 | 1.38 ± 0.13 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | 1.55 ± 0.47 | 6.06 ± 0.94 | 9.95 ± 0.69 | 4.25 ± 0.17 |
| F ment | 0.79 ± 0.25 | 0.80 ± 0.22 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.80 ± 0.59 | 4.61 ± 0.74 | 4.70 ± 0.53 | 10.10 ± 0.26 | 4.63 ± 0.57 |
Table 2. Mandibular canal measurement values of male Van cats ( n = 7).
| Measurements | h | w | Fw | Flin | Bh | dep | Mh | Mw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) |
| Right Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.43 ± 0.30 | 2.23 ± 0.14 | 2.25 ± 0.18 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 5.18 ± 1.31 | - | - | 4.49 ± 1.72 |
| RD M1 | 2.03 ± 0.54 | 1.88 ± 0.56 | 1.58 ± 0.32 | 1.58 ± 0.39 | 2.38 ± 0.57 | 5.98 ± 0.59 | 10.40 ± 0.72 | 5.06 ± 0.58 |
| RM M1 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 1.60 ± 0.08 | 1.85 ± 0.24 | 1.65 ± 0.26 | 2.35 ± 0.31 | 5.90 ± 0.32 | 10.10 ± 1.15 | 5.12 ± 0.36 |
| RD PM2 | 1.80 ± 0.28 | 1.55 ± 0.17 | 1.93 ± 0.22 | 1.80 ± 0.51 | 2.53 ± 0.24 | 5.88 ± 0.81 | 10.23 ± 0.43 | 5.30 ± 0.51 |
| RM PM2 | 1.68 ± 0.24 | 1.48 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.22 | 2.03 ± 0.83 | 2.53 ± 0.13 | 5.88 ± 0.61 | 10.12 ± 0.43 | 5.43 ± 0.38 |
| RD PM1 | 1.98 ± 0.31 | 1.68 ± 0.29 | 1.48 ± 0.05 | 1.78 ± 0.67 | 2.38 ± 0.25 | 5.08 ± 0.74 | 9.45 ± 0.66 | 5.25 ± 0.99 |
| RM PM1 | 2.00 ± 0.74 | 1.70 ± 0.27 | 1.32 ± 0.33 | 1.34 ± 0.69 | 2.15 ± 0.40 | 6.00 ± 0.46 | 10.16 ± 0.76 | 4.36 ± 0.64 |
| F ment | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 0.80 ± 0.25 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.63 ± 0.78 | 4.73 ± 0.51 | 4.73 ± 0.90 | 10.25 ± 1.15 | 4.44 ± 0.59 |
| Left Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.50 ± 0.41 | 2.28 ± 0.17 | 2.25 ± 0.18 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 5.20 ± 1.28 | - | - | 4.53 ± 1.76 |
| RD M1 | 2.03 ± 0.54 | 1.80 ± 0.54 | 1.68 ± 0.26 | 1.33 ± 0.13 | 2.40 ± 0.54 | 5.93 ± 0.38 | 10.38 ± 0.50 | 4.83 ± 0.53 |
| RM M1 | 1.83 ± 0.39 | 1.53 ± 0.15 | 1.85 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.42 | 2.40 ± 0.38 | 6.05 ± 0.61 | 9.84 ± 0.74 | 5.30 ± 0.27 |
| RD PM2 | 1.93 ± 0.25 | 1.45 ± 0.13 | 1.88 ± 0.45 | 1.78 ± 0.64 | 2.60 ± 0.24 | 5.38 ± 0.99 | 9.93 ± 0.35 | 5.13 ± 0.46 |
| RM PM2 | 1.80 ± 0.27 | 1.58 ± 0.24 | 1.95 ± 0.31 | 1.80 ± 0.37 | 2.63 ± 0.14 | 5.89 ± 0.57 | 10.33 ± 0.41 | 5.33 ± 0.33 |
| RD PM1 | 2.08 ± 0.30 | 1.55 ± 0.34 | 1.63 ± 0.39 | 1.60 ± 0.81 | 2.58 ± 0.46 | 5.40 ± 0.89 | 10.07 ± 0.78 | 4.80 ± 0.92 |
| RM PM1 | 1.98 ± 0.76 | 1.70 ± 0.27 | 1.30 ± 0.32 | 1.30 ± 0.62 | 2.38 ± 0.49 | 5.75 ± 0.50 | 10.12 ± 0.30 | 4.31 ± 0.50 |
| F ment | 0.79 ± 0.34 | 0.80 ± 0.32 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.60 ± 0.74 | 4.73 ± 0.52 | 4.71 ± 0.87 | 10.23 ± 1.37 | 4.43 ± 0.66 |
与高度参数类似,MC宽度沿其头尾方向轨迹呈现出明显的空间变化(表1和表2)。在雌性Van猫中,该管在下颌孔起始处保持较大直径,在第一磨牙近中根区域达到最大宽度,而在第二前磨牙近中根区域显著变窄。从该标志点向头侧,MC在第一前磨牙近中根区域之前持续扩张,随后向与吻侧颏孔交界处逐渐变窄,此处记录到最小宽度。相反,在雄性Van猫中,该管在下颌孔处较宽,在第一磨牙远中根区域达到峰值直径,并在第一磨牙近中根区域收缩。此后,它向第一前磨牙近中根区域稳步扩张,随后逐渐变窄至吻侧颏孔交界处的最小宽度。
沿MC走行记录的Fw和Flin值总结于表1和表2。当该管在磨牙和前磨牙区域嵌入骨实质内时,Flin值迅速增加,表明其位于下颌骨体内的中央轨迹。在雌雄两性中,MC从磨牙区域向第一前磨牙远中面靠近骨骼正中心推进,维持平衡轨迹并略向舌侧倾斜。然而,与雌性相比,雄性中的该管轨迹明显更靠近前庭皮质,尤其是在第二前磨牙远中面水平。向头侧移动,在通过吻侧颏孔出口之前,该管在第一前磨牙近中根水平出现关键性缩窄。在该区域,雌雄Van猫的MC均明显向内并向前庭侧偏移。最后,在吻侧颏孔水平,随着该管经前庭皮质向外开口,Fw值达到零(Fw = 0.00)。
在本研究中,对所有Van猫的Fw和Flin值进行了统计学比较。在所有孔和牙齿区域,Fw与Flin测量值之间未检测到总体差异(p > 0.05),主要归因于零(0.00)解剖值引入的高方差。然而,当排除这些绝对零值以专门分析下颌管沿牙根走行的骨内路径时,Fw值显著大于Flin值(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,p = 0.0067)。
此外,对所有评估Van猫的左右下颌管参数进行统计学分析比较,未发现显著的双侧差异(表3),证实了高度双侧对称性。
Table 3. Statistical Evaluation ( p -values) of Differences Between the Right and Left Sides in Van Cats.
| p -Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurements | h | w | Fw | Flin | Bh | dep | Mh | Mw |
| References | Female ( n = 7) | |||||||
| F mand | 0.698 | 0.430 | 0.673 | 1.000 | 0.831 | - | - | 0.852 |
| RD M1 | 0.691 | 0.494 | 0.192 | 0.704 | 0.901 | 0.787 | 0.825 | 0.113 |
| RM M1 | 0.664 | 0.727 | 0.669 | 0.731 | 0.540 | 0.886 | 0.534 | 0.387 |
| RD PM2 | 0.722 | 0.580 | 0.932 | 0.595 | 0.908 | 0.860 | 0.625 | 0.515 |
| RM PM2 | 0.698 | 0.704 | 0.694 | 1.000 | 0.919 | 0.900 | 0.600 | 0.403 |
| RD PM1 | 0.735 | 0.740 | 0.819 | 0.785 | 0.708 | 0.725 | 0.532 | 0.565 |
| RM PM1 | 0.966 | 0.907 | 0.786 | 0.829 | 0.835 | 0.983 | 0.893 | 1.000 |
| F ment | 0.934 | 0.936 | 1.000 | 0.762 | 0.919 | 0.860 | 0.603 | 0.735 |
| Male ( n = 7) | ||||||||
| F mand | 0.722 | 0.559 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.977 | - | - | 0.966 |
| RD M1 | 1.000 | 0.790 | 0.533 | 0.134 | 0.947 | 0.854 | 0.953 | 0.454 |
| RM M1 | 0.923 | 0.297 | 0.998 | 0.205 | 0.792 | 0.575 | 0.624 | 0.311 |
| RD PM2 | 0.378 | 0.240 | 0.796 | 0.950 | 0.595 | 0.321 | 0.178 | 0.525 |
| RM PM2 | 0.397 | 0.386 | 0.734 | 0.516 | 0.191 | 0.975 | 0.368 | 0.609 |
| RD PM1 | 0.551 | 0.456 | 0.333 | 0.659 | 0.332 | 0.479 | 0.134 | 0.396 |
| RM PM1 | 0.961 | 1.000 | 0.910 | 0.911 | 0.355 | 0.349 | 0.899 | 0.873 |
| F ment | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.942 | 1.000 | 0.967 | 0.977 | 0.977 |
就相对于牙槽嵴的深度而言,发现Van猫的下颌管(MC)走行呈轻微弯曲的U形而非直线轨迹。此外,MC的深度沿其走行并不均匀,在雌性和雄性Van猫中均有波动(表1和表2)。同样,下颌骨沿MC走行的高度和宽度也不均匀,表现出局部增加和减少(表1和表2)。第一磨牙远中根区域被记录为下颌骨体的最高点。下颌骨体在同一牙齿近中根处背腹向变窄,至第一前磨牙近中根之前保持几乎恒定的高度,在吻侧颏孔区域表现出轻微抬高。下颌骨体的最宽点位于第二前磨牙近中根区域,而最窄点见于第一前磨牙近中根对应区域。
关于下颌管在性别间的统计学比较,管道尺寸,特别是h、w、Fw、Flin、Mh和Mw,在雌性和雄性梵猫之间未显示出显著差异。然而,下颌管沿其地形走行表现出明显的性别相关变化(表4)。具体而言,雄性梵猫下颌管至腹侧边界的距离(Bh)显著更大,使管道相对于雌性梵猫位置更高。相反,雌性在第一前臼齿远中根处下颌管的深度(dep)显著更大。
Table 4. Statistical comparison of mandibular canal measurements according to sex.
| Measurement Areas/References | Female Mean ± SD ( n = 7) (mm) | Male Mean ± SD ( n = 7) (mm) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| RD PM1—Bh (Right) | 1.78 ± 0.37 | 2.38 ± 0.25 | 0.004 ** |
| RD PM1—Bh (Left) | 1.85 ± 0.31 | 2.58 ± 0.46 | 0.005 ** |
| RD PM2—Bh (Right) | 2.05 ± 0.31 | 2.53 ± 0.24 | 0.007 ** |
| RD PM2—Bh (Left) | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 2.60 ± 0.24 | 0.003 ** |
| RM PM1—Bh (Right) | 1.50 ± 0.41 | 2.15 ± 0.40 | 0.011 * |
| RM PM1—Bh (Left) | 1.55 ± 0.47 | 2.38 ± 0.49 | 0.007 ** |
| RD PM1—dep (Right) | 5.85 ± 0.25 | 5.08 ± 074 | 0.033 * |
| RD PM1—dep (Left) | 5.90 ± 0.27 | 5.14 ± 0.89 | 0.043 * |
| All Tooth Regions (h, w, Fw, Flin, Mh, Mw) | Similar Distribution | Similar Distribution | p > 0.05 |
4. 讨论
本研究首次使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测定了梵猫下颌管(MC)的形态计量学数值。X线摄影、计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像等诊断成像方式常规用于MC的解剖学评估[26]。计算机断层扫描(CT)因其测量准确性和对解剖边界及变异的清晰可视化,被认为是牙科硬组织成像的金标准[27]。此外,它作为一种非侵入性、快速且高度可靠的诊断工具,具有重要的临床价值[26]。在颌骨评估中,断层成像相较于二维方法具有明显优势,允许对地形关系进行多平面可视化(矢状面、横断面和背侧面)以及三维结构重建,从而增强手术规划[28,29]。CT和CBCT在兽医牙科应用中最关键的参数之一是空间分辨率,其直接受层厚影响[30,31]。在本研究中,使用CS 9600系统(Carestream Dental LLC,Atlanta,GA,USA)以0.4 mm体素大小和8 × 5 cm下颌视野获取CBCT图像,为精确的形态计量学评估提供了足够的空间分辨率。该方案及类似的高分辨率方案能够对MC进行清晰的横断面成像,而不受邻近解剖结构的重叠影响[27]。
与本研究获得的MC直径(高度和宽度)结果一致,确定梵猫的管道高度从下颌孔开始沿牙弓遵循逐渐减小、保持不变、增大、再次减小的循环。此外,梵猫的MC宽度沿其走行表现出轻微的扩张和狭窄。在这方面,我们的发现与Cotrim等人(2015)[22]在混种猫中报道的结果一致,他们同样观察到MC高度沿牙弓的区域性波动以及特定牙齿位置处管道宽度的细微变化。在一项针对人类的研究中,Scomparim(2013)[32]提出,MC宽度沿其走行表现出的这些轻微波动源于前臼齿和臼齿不同根大小所产生的解剖压力。在下颌孔水平测量的下颌管(MC)最大高度(h)和宽度(w)对局部麻醉操作具有重要的实际意义。了解下颌入口处的这些尺寸有助于在拔牙及下颌前部或后部干预期间实现有效的麻醉药物扩散,同时将直接针刺创伤或神经内注射的风险降至最低。在第一前臼齿近中根处观察到的MC明显结构狭窄和向内移位,随后在颏前孔连接处出现最小高度和宽度,代表了牙科操作中的高风险区域。在进行第一前臼齿的复杂拔除或手术性根尖取出时,临床医生必须极其谨慎。
在检查下颌管(MC)与舌侧及前庭面的邻近关系时发现,Van猫的下颌管沿一条靠近舌侧面的线路前行,直至第一磨牙的近中侧。自此点往后,其走行逐渐居中,但仍向舌侧方向倾斜,直至第一前磨牙的远中侧,最终从第一前磨牙处朝向前庭缘、向吻侧颏孔方向走行并向外开口。因此,我们的结果与Cotrim等(2015)[22]的发现相似,他们同样报道混种猫的下颌管在磨牙区更靠近舌侧皮质板走行,在接近吻侧颏孔时则转向靠前庭面。该走行的一般轨迹也与中头型及短头型犬的管道路径相似,即在磨牙区靠近舌侧面走行,随后至第三前磨牙前居中于前庭皮质与舌侧皮质之间,最终在颏孔区终止于靠近前庭皮质处[10]。由于Van猫的下颌管在下颌体的大部分长度上均更靠近舌侧面,可以认为其也与人类所描述的地形分布具有相似性[18,19]。从临床角度来看,Van猫下颌管在磨牙水平靠近内侧(舌侧)壁的区域走行,以及在在前磨牙水平自中线朝向外侧(面侧/前庭侧)方向走行,为兽医牙科及颌面部干预提供了关键的实际指导。在下颌骨骨折固定(如接骨板-螺钉应用)、牙髓治疗、复杂拔牙或种植手术中,对下颌体的操作本身即存在损伤下牙槽神经血管束的固有风险[19]。我们的形态计量学及统计学比较表明,外侧(面侧)骨壁相较舌侧提供了显著更宽的安全手术边缘。因此,针对外侧面进行的手术入路可提供临床上更安全的轨迹,以在置入硬件或骨操作过程中最大程度减少潜在的神经血管损伤。
我们的发现中不存在显著的双侧差异,这表明Van猫下颌管(MC)的地形方位呈现出相对稳定且对称的形态计量学特征。虽然功能性不对称(如单侧咀嚼或局部生物力学力量)理论上可能影响骨改建,但我们的横断面形态计量学数据并未显示任何侧别偏倚。然而,要明确断定管道形态完全不受长期功能适应或生物力学应力的影响,仍需进一步开展前瞻性研究,探究包括年龄、性别、体重及功能性咀嚼模式在内的特定临床变量。管道参数——特别是至腹侧缘的距离(Bh)及下颌宽度(Mw)——在左右两侧之间无显著差异,这一发现为兽医外科医生提供了重要的实际优势。在下颌骨骨折病例中,从健侧获得的影像学或形态计量学数据可作为可靠的参考,用于对侧损伤侧的手术规划,如螺钉长度选择及接骨板放置。尽管如此,这不应削弱进一步研究的必要性,这些研究旨在表征不同头型生物型的其他猫品种的MC,正如Valarelli等(2007)[33]所建议的那样。事实上,在这项针对Van猫的品种特异性研究中,应当注意,在雄猫进行前磨牙及磨牙手术或牙髓治疗时,管道显著更靠近牙根;这种邻近关系可能增加医源性损伤或根尖病变对管道施加压力的风险。相反,在雌猫下颌孔水平进行下牙槽神经阻滞时,进针点可能需要相对于下颌骨腹侧缘进行调整。这些解剖变异似乎与品种特征及整体形态结构密切相关。正如Martinez等(2009)[10]所指出的,此类情况主要可归因于所分析动物总体体型大小的变异。
在分析下颌管(MC)深度(dep)时,我们的结果与混合品种猫[22]的报道值部分不同。据报道,在混合品种猫以及短头和中头犬中,下颌管从下颌孔下行至第一磨牙近中根区域,在此处达到最大深度,并向吻侧颏孔呈线性平滑上升[22]。相比之下,我们对Van猫的研究结果表明,该路径并非简单的线性轨迹,因为下颌管在第一前磨牙近中面再次加深。Martinez等(2009)[10]将MC最深位置位于第一磨牙近中面归因于其牙根在下颌体内的显著高度。因此,可以假设Van猫第一前磨牙近中根高度可能相对大于相邻前磨牙。然而,为确认这一潜在关系,未来需要进行结合精确MC坐标与牙根形态测量学定量相关分析的研究。此外,沿MC轨迹观察到的垂直波动也可能受下颌体皮质骨结构的区域差异影响。支持这一结构作用的是,Eto等(2023)[34]报道颊侧皮质骨厚度和高度因性别而显著变化,雌性相对于MC位置的皮质骨更薄且骨高度更低。因此,评估这些皮质骨变异与MC之间的关系,以及年龄、性别、体重和双侧对称性等基本生物学变量,仍是未来研究的重要目标。MC沿下颌体的非线性U形垂直轨迹表明,神经血管受累的风险沿牙弓动态变化。由于下颌管在磨牙区加深、向吻侧上升并在第一前磨牙处再次加深,对管深的标准线性假设可能导致术中并发症。下颌体骨折的手术稳定必须考虑这些垂直波动,以避免在复位和 hardware 置入过程中压迫下颌管。此外,我们研究中观察到的统计学显著性别特异性变异决定了量身定制的手术规划;雌性猫在第一前磨牙远中根处表现出显著更大的管深(dep)。这些形态学差异提示,临床兽医在Van猫腹侧下颌缘手术或吻侧前磨牙区置入 hardware 时,应根据性别调整钻深和螺钉长度。
本研究的主要局限性包括样本量相对较小和研究组人口统计学多样性受限,以及缺乏皮质骨厚度测量。动物数量有限限制了所获形态测量数据直接推广至更广泛的猫群体。此外,由于所有评估动物均标准化为4岁龄且体重范围狭窄,无法评估年龄相关变化(如年轻或老年个体)以及体重依赖的下颌骨密度、皮质厚度或管地形变化。颅骨大小或体重的显著变化如何影响MC的毫米位置仍有待未来研究确定。最后,尽管管的垂直和水平波动可能与腹侧和外侧皮质骨的区域变异有关,但本研究未对皮质骨厚度进行计量学量化。
5. 结论
总之,本研究以毫米精度揭示了Van猫下颌管的地形及性别依赖性形态测量变异。本研究获得的形态测量参考值将为临床兽医在Van猫牙科手术和再生性颌面手术中防止医源性神经血管损伤提供有价值的指导。此外,我们相信本研究结果将为未来针对下颌管的大规模群体研究铺平道路,涵盖不同猫品种、年龄组、体重和皮质骨厚度测量。
缩写
本手稿中使用以下缩写:
| BW | Body Weight |
| CBCT | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
| DICOM | Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine |
| FOV | Field of View |
| i.m. | Intramuscular |
| MC | Mandibular Canal |
| MPR | Multiplanar Reconstruction |
| SPSS | Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
作者贡献
概念化,V.D.和S.K.;方法学,V.D.和S.K.;软件,V.D.和S.K.;验证,V.D.和S.K.;形式分析,V.D.和S.K.;调查,V.D.和S.K.;资源,V.D.;数据管理,V.D.和S.K.;写作——初稿准备,V.D.和S.K.;写作——审阅和编辑,V.D.和S.K.;可视化,V.D.;监督,V.D.;项目管理,V.D.;资金获取,V.D.所有作者均已阅读并同意手稿的出版版本。
机构审查委员会声明
本研究经Van Yuzuncu Yil大学地方动物实验伦理委员会审查和批准,决定编号2026/7-25。
知情同意声明
不适用。
数据可用性声明
本研究生成的数据集可向通讯作者索取。
利益冲突
作者声明无利益冲突。
资助声明
本研究未获得外部资助。
脚注
[内容请查看原文]
参考文献
[内容请查看原文]
关联数据
数据可用性声明
本研究生成的数据集可向通讯作者索取。
查看英文原文▾
Simple Summary
Although Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) is established in veterinary dentistry for evaluating feline maxillofacial structures and dental abnormalities, comprehensive multi-landmark morphometric analyses of the canalis mandibularis in cats remain limited. Using the Van cat as a model, this study addresses this gap by providing a detailed evaluation of the canal’s trajectory along the entire length of the mandible. Unlike previous canine and feline studies that restricted their scope to isolated regions or single root apices, this research introduces a broader approach by analyzing eight distinct anatomical landmarks, extending from the foramen mandibulare to the rostral foramen mentale. This approach yields a precise morphometric mapping of the mandibular canal trajectory. Ultimately, these findings aim to provide an enhanced anatomical blueprint and clinical reference for veterinary surgeons, thereby reducing the risk of neurovascular injury during critical feline maxillofacial procedures, including tooth extractions, endodontic treatments, and fracture fixations.
Keywords: anatomy, cone-beam computed tomography, mandibular canal, morphometric
1. Introduction
The mandibular canal (MC) is a critical intraosseous passage within the mandible that transmits the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle, providing sensory innervation and vascular supply to the teeth, gingivae, and adjacent soft tissues [1,2]. In carnivores, the canal originates at the foramen mandibulare, located on the medial surface of the ramus mandibulae adjacent to the pterygoid fossa the insertion site of the musculus pterygoideus medialis [3]. It courses rostrally within the mandibular body and opens onto the buccal surface via the mental foramina (rostral, middle, and caudal/distal) at the level of the canine and premolar teeth [3].
In dentoalveolar surgery, precise knowledge of the spatial relationship between the MC and adjacent tooth roots is crucial [4]. Oral and maxillofacial pathologies are highly prevalent in feline practice, with tooth extraction representing the most frequently performed surgical procedure [5]. During extractions and other endodontic or oncologic surgical interventions, improper technique or anatomical blind spots can lead to severe iatrogenic complications, including profuse hemorrhage, mandibular fractures, root/tooth displacement, and permanent nerve injury [6,7,8]. Consequently, preserving the structural integrity of the MC and its neurovascular contents is paramount during surgical procedures involving the feline lower jaw [9,10,11].
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) enables precise visualization of complex maxillofacial structures and abnormalities through multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and three-dimensional (3D) modeling capabilities [12,13,14]. This modality represents a validated, reliable tool for sub-millimetric spatial assessment of the MC prior to surgical interventions [15,16]. The Van cat is a breed originating in Turkey, characterized by a triangular-shaped head, small nose, and body entirely covered with white hair, with its most distinctive feature being its characteristic eye coloration, with one eye typically blue and the other light amber-yellow [17].
While the extensive literature in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery has characterized mandibular osteology in humans [18,19] and dogs [10,12,20], comparable morphometric research regarding domestic or wild felids remains remarkably limited [21,22]. Although the application of CBCT in feline diagnostic imaging has been documented in a few studies [23,24], standardized quantitative baselines for regional mandibular morphometrics are still lacking. In felids, various painful dental conditions requiring surgical management such as tooth resorption can lead to severe craniofacial dysfunction [6]. Consequently, a lack of detailed anatomical knowledge during surgical planning increases the risk of severe iatrogenic complications [11,25]. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the morphometric variations in the mandibular canal in male and female Van cats using CBCT, thereby establishing breed-specific anatomical baselines to enhance clinical safety during feline maxillofacial procedures.
2. Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments (decision number: 2026/07-25). A total of 14 healthy adult Van cats (7 males, 7 females) were evaluated based on high-quality Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. Systemic health status was confirmed through a comprehensive physical examination (assessment of body temperature, hydration status, mucous membrane color, and cardiopulmonary auscultation) alongside a complete medical history showing no evidence of chronic disease or recent pharmacological intervention. Inclusion criteria comprised intact (non-neutered) adult cats, exactly 4 years of age, with a mean body mass of 3.3 ± 0.49 kg, displaying no visible anatomical anomalies or prior surgical interventions. Conversely, the exclusion criteria comprised juvenile individuals with incomplete dental development, geriatric cats, and any subjects presenting with dental or periodontal diseases.
To prevent motion artifacts and ensure complete immobility during CBCT acquisition, a standardized sedation protocol was applied. Food and water were withheld for 8 h and 3 h, respectively, prior to sedation to minimize the risk of aspiration pneumonia. Sedation was induced via intramuscular (IM) administration of xylazine hydrochloride(at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg body weight; Alfazyne® 2% injectable solution, Ege Vet Veterinary Medicines, İzmir, Türkiye). Depth of sedation and vital signs were monitored throughout the procedure. Prior to imaging, a thorough oral examination was performed on all cats. The CBCT imaging was conducted using the scanner located at the Faculty of Dentistry. Each cat was positioned in sternal recumbency on a height-adjustable scanning table, with the head extended onto a carbon-fiber, radiolucent extension platform specifically designed for the scanner (Figure 1). To ensure reproducible head alignment and minimize motion artifacts, positioning foam wedges were placed beneath the neck, centering the head within the CBCT field of view (FOV) (Figure 1).
[图:A Van cat secured for imaging in a CBCT machine.]

All Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired using a CS 9600 system (Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA) with an 8 × 5 cm mandibular field of view (FOV). Exposure and acquisition parameters were standardized across all subjects as follows: tube voltage of: 120 kVp, tube current-time product of 5 mAs, scan duration of 7 s, and an isotropic voxel size of 0.4 mm. Image analysis and morphometric evaluations were performed using CS 3D Imaging software (Version 3.10, Carestream Dental LLC). Prior to morphometric measurements, DICOM datasets were transferred to a dedicated workstation and reoriented into a standardized head position using the Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) module (Version 3.10, Carestream Dental LLC). The Frankfort horizontal plane, defined by the bilateral orbitale and porion points, was adjusted parallel to the floor, and the mid-sagittal plane was aligned with the facial midline. Morphometric evaluation of the canalis mandibularis along its rostrocaudal trajectory was conducted across eight standardized anatomical landmarks. The definitions and spatial locations of these reference landmarks are illustrated in Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4.
[图:Schematic representation of the eight transverse plane landmarks used for morphometric evaluation of the mandibular cana]

[图:CBCT sagittal image of eight measurement sites (red line) used in morphometric measurements of the mandibular canal. ( a]

[图:CBCT transversal image of eight measurement sites used in morphometric measurements of the mandibular canal. ( a ) F man]

To ensure measurement consistency and anatomical accuracy, all CBCT evaluations were performed by an experienced veterinarian trained in diagnostic imaging. Quantitative parameters including the internal dimensions of the mandibular canal (Figure 5A), its spatial relationships relative to the external cortical borders (Figure 5B), and the overall mandibular height and width (Figure 5C) were recorded at each predefined anatomical reference landmark:
[图:Morphometric measurement parameters of the mandibular canal. ( A ) h: height of the canalis mandibularis, w: width of th]

h: Height of the canalis mandibularis (Figure 5A).
w: Width of the canalis mandibularis (Figure 5A).
Flin: Distance between the canalis mandibularis and the lingual border (Figure 5B).
Fw: Distance between the canalis mandibularis and the vestibular border (Figure 5B).
Bh: Distance from the canalis mandibularis to the ventral border (Figure 5B).
dep (Depth of the mandibular canal): The vertical distance measured from the alveolar crest line to the superior border of the mandibular canal. (Figure 5B).
Mh (Total vertical height of the mandible): The distance measured from the most superior point of the alveolar crest to the base of the mandible. (Figure 5C).
Mw: Width of the mandible (Figure 5C).
The normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Because the datasets did not follow a normal distribution, non-parametric statistical methods were employed. Paired morphometric parameters between the right and left mandibles were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to evaluate bilateral symmetry. Differences between sexes (male vs. female) were evaluated using the Mann–Whitney U test. Continuous variables are expressed as “mean ± standard deviation (SD)” All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 21.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A two-tailed p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3. Results
Morphometric analysis revealed distinct spatial variations in mandibular canal (MC) height along its rostrocaudal trajectory. In female Van cats, the maximum MC height was observed at the level of the foramen mandibulare. The height exhibited a marked decrease toward the mesial root of the first molar tooth and remained relatively constant up to the distal aspect of the second premolar. It then elevated rostrally toward the mesial root of the first premolar before progressively tapering toward its junction with the rostral foramen mentale, which represented the point of minimal canal height (Table 1 and Table 2). Although a similar overall trend was observed in male Van cats, the MC maintained a noticeably more uniform height extending from the mesial aspect of the first molar tooth to the mesial aspect of the second premolar (Table 1 and Table 2).
Table 1. Mandibular canal measurement values of female Van cats ( n = 7).
| Measurements | h | w | Fw | Flin | Bh | dep | Mh | Mw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) |
| Right Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.38 ± 0.33 | 2.18 ± 0.15 | 2.20 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.68 ± 0.58 | - | - | 4.39 ± 0.15 |
| RD M1 | 1.93 ± 0.22 | 1.63 ± 0.25 | 1.40 ± 0.16 | 1.50 ± 0.22 | 2.48 ± 1.01 | 5.78 ± 0.25 | 10.19 ± 0.63 | 4.56 ± 0.29 |
| RM M1 | 1.75 ± 0.31 | 1.81 ± 0.21 | 1.60 ± 0.27 | 1.55 ± 0.44 | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 5.93 ± 0.90 | 9.72 ± 0.88 | 4.97 ± 0.36 |
| RD PM2 | 1.78 ± 0.35 | 1.73 ± 0.22 | 1.73 ± 0.43 | 1.38 ± 0.24 | 2.05 ± 0.31 | 5.70 ± 0.82 | 9.53 ± 0.57 | 4.85 ± 0.47 |
| RM PM2 | 2.05 ± 0.41 | 1.65 ± 0.26 | 1.73 ± 0.33 | 1.68 ± 0.62 | 2.33 ± 0.87 | 5.53 ± 0.98 | 9.91 ± 0.66 | 5.07 ± 0.26 |
| RD PM1 | 2.15 ± 0.25 | 1.68 ± 0.29 | 1.65 ± 0.39 | 1.33 ± 0.32 | 1.78 ± 0.37 | 5.85 ± 0.25 | 9.79 ± 0.49 | 4.68 ± 0.48 |
| RM PM1 | 2.35 ± 0.41 | 1.80 ± 0.34 | 1.40 ± 0.14 | 1.03 ± 0.17 | 1.50 ± 0.41 | 6.05 ± 0.87 | 9.90 ± 0.68 | 4.25 ± 0.17 |
| F ment | 0.78 ± 0.19 | 0.81 ± 0.24 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.70 ± 0.62 | 4.65 ± 0.70 | 4.75 ± 0.51 | 10.18 ± 0.30 | 4.53 ± 0.51 |
| Left Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.45 ± 0.33 | 2.25 ± 0.17 | 2.23 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 4.75 ± 0.62 | - | - | 4.48 ± 1.22 |
| RD M1 | 1.88 ± 0.24 | 1.73 ± 0.28 | 1.53 ± 0.19 | 1.55 ± 0.26 | 2.55 ± 1.07 | 5.68 ± 0.91 | 10.12 ± 0.53 | 4.82 ± 0.28 |
| RM M1 | 1.83 ± 0.36 | 1.85 ± 0.21 | 1.68 ± 0.40 | 1.63 ± 0.41 | 2.15 ± 0.38 | 6.00 ± 0.89 | 9.98 ± 0.61 | 5.15 ± 0.39 |
| RD PM2 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 1.80 ± 0.24 | 1.75 ± 0.44 | 1.45 ± 0.24 | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 5.78 ± 0.85 | 9.68 ± 0.55 | 5.02 ± 0.48 |
| RM PM2 | 2.13 ± 0.34 | 1.70 ± 0.22 | 1.80 ± 0.32 | 1.68 ± 0.55 | 2.38 ± 0.94 | 5.60 ± 1.06 | 10.10 ± 0.66 | 5.20 ± 0.30 |
| RD PM1 | 2.20 ± 0.29 | 1.73 ± 0.26 | 1.70 ± 0.41 | 1.38 ± 0.35 | 1.85 ± 0.31 | 5.90 ± 0.27 | 9.96 ± 0.50 | 4.83 ± 0.47 |
| RM PM1 | 2.34 ± 0.45 | 1.78 ± 0.29 | 1.38 ± 0.13 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | 1.55 ± 0.47 | 6.06 ± 0.94 | 9.95 ± 0.69 | 4.25 ± 0.17 |
| F ment | 0.79 ± 0.25 | 0.80 ± 0.22 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.80 ± 0.59 | 4.61 ± 0.74 | 4.70 ± 0.53 | 10.10 ± 0.26 | 4.63 ± 0.57 |
Table 2. Mandibular canal measurement values of male Van cats ( n = 7).
| Measurements | h | w | Fw | Flin | Bh | dep | Mh | Mw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) | Mean ± SD (mm) |
| Right Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.43 ± 0.30 | 2.23 ± 0.14 | 2.25 ± 0.18 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 5.18 ± 1.31 | - | - | 4.49 ± 1.72 |
| RD M1 | 2.03 ± 0.54 | 1.88 ± 0.56 | 1.58 ± 0.32 | 1.58 ± 0.39 | 2.38 ± 0.57 | 5.98 ± 0.59 | 10.40 ± 0.72 | 5.06 ± 0.58 |
| RM M1 | 1.85 ± 0.37 | 1.60 ± 0.08 | 1.85 ± 0.24 | 1.65 ± 0.26 | 2.35 ± 0.31 | 5.90 ± 0.32 | 10.10 ± 1.15 | 5.12 ± 0.36 |
| RD PM2 | 1.80 ± 0.28 | 1.55 ± 0.17 | 1.93 ± 0.22 | 1.80 ± 0.51 | 2.53 ± 0.24 | 5.88 ± 0.81 | 10.23 ± 0.43 | 5.30 ± 0.51 |
| RM PM2 | 1.68 ± 0.24 | 1.48 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.22 | 2.03 ± 0.83 | 2.53 ± 0.13 | 5.88 ± 0.61 | 10.12 ± 0.43 | 5.43 ± 0.38 |
| RD PM1 | 1.98 ± 0.31 | 1.68 ± 0.29 | 1.48 ± 0.05 | 1.78 ± 0.67 | 2.38 ± 0.25 | 5.08 ± 0.74 | 9.45 ± 0.66 | 5.25 ± 0.99 |
| RM PM1 | 2.00 ± 0.74 | 1.70 ± 0.27 | 1.32 ± 0.33 | 1.34 ± 0.69 | 2.15 ± 0.40 | 6.00 ± 0.46 | 10.16 ± 0.76 | 4.36 ± 0.64 |
| F ment | 0.79 ± 0.22 | 0.80 ± 0.25 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.63 ± 0.78 | 4.73 ± 0.51 | 4.73 ± 0.90 | 10.25 ± 1.15 | 4.44 ± 0.59 |
| Left Mandibular Canal | ||||||||
| F mand | 2.50 ± 0.41 | 2.28 ± 0.17 | 2.25 ± 0.18 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 5.20 ± 1.28 | - | - | 4.53 ± 1.76 |
| RD M1 | 2.03 ± 0.54 | 1.80 ± 0.54 | 1.68 ± 0.26 | 1.33 ± 0.13 | 2.40 ± 0.54 | 5.93 ± 0.38 | 10.38 ± 0.50 | 4.83 ± 0.53 |
| RM M1 | 1.83 ± 0.39 | 1.53 ± 0.15 | 1.85 ± 0.17 | 1.90 ± 0.42 | 2.40 ± 0.38 | 6.05 ± 0.61 | 9.84 ± 0.74 | 5.30 ± 0.27 |
| RD PM2 | 1.93 ± 0.25 | 1.45 ± 0.13 | 1.88 ± 0.45 | 1.78 ± 0.64 | 2.60 ± 0.24 | 5.38 ± 0.99 | 9.93 ± 0.35 | 5.13 ± 0.46 |
| RM PM2 | 1.80 ± 0.27 | 1.58 ± 0.24 | 1.95 ± 0.31 | 1.80 ± 0.37 | 2.63 ± 0.14 | 5.89 ± 0.57 | 10.33 ± 0.41 | 5.33 ± 0.33 |
| RD PM1 | 2.08 ± 0.30 | 1.55 ± 0.34 | 1.63 ± 0.39 | 1.60 ± 0.81 | 2.58 ± 0.46 | 5.40 ± 0.89 | 10.07 ± 0.78 | 4.80 ± 0.92 |
| RM PM1 | 1.98 ± 0.76 | 1.70 ± 0.27 | 1.30 ± 0.32 | 1.30 ± 0.62 | 2.38 ± 0.49 | 5.75 ± 0.50 | 10.12 ± 0.30 | 4.31 ± 0.50 |
| F ment | 0.79 ± 0.34 | 0.80 ± 0.32 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 3.60 ± 0.74 | 4.73 ± 0.52 | 4.71 ± 0.87 | 10.23 ± 1.37 | 4.43 ± 0.66 |
Similarly to the height parameters, the MC width exhibited marked spatial variations along its rostrocaudal trajectory (Table 1 and Table 2). In female Van cats, the canal maintained a broad diameter at its origin at the foramen mandibulare, attained its maximum width at the mesial root region of the first molar, and narrowed significantly at the mesial root region of the second premolar. From this landmark rostrally, the MC demonstrated continuous expansion up to the mesial root region of the first premolar, followed by a progressive narrowing toward its junction with the rostral foramen mentale, where the minimum width was recorded. In male Van cats, conversely, the canal was wide at the foramen mandibulare, reached its peak diameter at the distal root region of the first molar, and constricted at the mesial root region of the first molar. Thereafter, it displayed a steady expansion toward the mesial root region of the first premolar before tapering to its minimum width at the rostral foramen mentale junction.
The Fw and Flin values recorded along the course of the MC are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. As the canal becomes embedded within the osseous parenchyma in the molar and premolar regions, the Flin value increases rapidly, indicating a central trajectory within the mandibular body. In both sexes, the MC progresses from the molar region toward the distal aspect of the first premolar near the exact center of the bone, maintaining a balanced trajectory with a slight lingual inclination. However, compared with females, the canal in males exhibits a trajectory positioned noticeably closer to the vestibular cortex, particularly at the level of the distal aspect of the second premolar. Moving rostrally, immediately prior to its exit through the rostral foramen mentale, the canal demonstrates a critical constriction at the level of the mesial root of the first premolar tooth. In this region, the MC shifts distinctly inward and toward the vestibular side in both male and female Van cats. Finally, at the level of the rostral foramen mentale, the Fw value reaches zero (Fw = 0.00) as the canal opens exteriorly through the vestibular cortex.
In our study, the Fw and Flin values for all Van cats were compared statistically. No overall difference was detected between Fw and Flin measurements across all foramen and tooth regions (p > 0.05), primarily due to the high variance introduced by zero (0.00) anatomical values. However, when these absolute zero values were excluded to specifically analyze the intraosseous course of the mandibular canal along the dental roots, Fw values were significantly greater than Flin values (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, p = 0.0067).
Furthermore, statistical analysis comparing the right and left canalis mandibularis parameters across all evaluated Van cats revealed no significant bilateral differences (Table 3), confirming a high degree of bilateral symmetry.
Table 3. Statistical Evaluation ( p -values) of Differences Between the Right and Left Sides in Van Cats.
| p -Values | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Measurements | h | w | Fw | Flin | Bh | dep | Mh | Mw |
| References | Female ( n = 7) | |||||||
| F mand | 0.698 | 0.430 | 0.673 | 1.000 | 0.831 | - | - | 0.852 |
| RD M1 | 0.691 | 0.494 | 0.192 | 0.704 | 0.901 | 0.787 | 0.825 | 0.113 |
| RM M1 | 0.664 | 0.727 | 0.669 | 0.731 | 0.540 | 0.886 | 0.534 | 0.387 |
| RD PM2 | 0.722 | 0.580 | 0.932 | 0.595 | 0.908 | 0.860 | 0.625 | 0.515 |
| RM PM2 | 0.698 | 0.704 | 0.694 | 1.000 | 0.919 | 0.900 | 0.600 | 0.403 |
| RD PM1 | 0.735 | 0.740 | 0.819 | 0.785 | 0.708 | 0.725 | 0.532 | 0.565 |
| RM PM1 | 0.966 | 0.907 | 0.786 | 0.829 | 0.835 | 0.983 | 0.893 | 1.000 |
| F ment | 0.934 | 0.936 | 1.000 | 0.762 | 0.919 | 0.860 | 0.603 | 0.735 |
| Male ( n = 7) | ||||||||
| F mand | 0.722 | 0.559 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.977 | - | - | 0.966 |
| RD M1 | 1.000 | 0.790 | 0.533 | 0.134 | 0.947 | 0.854 | 0.953 | 0.454 |
| RM M1 | 0.923 | 0.297 | 0.998 | 0.205 | 0.792 | 0.575 | 0.624 | 0.311 |
| RD PM2 | 0.378 | 0.240 | 0.796 | 0.950 | 0.595 | 0.321 | 0.178 | 0.525 |
| RM PM2 | 0.397 | 0.386 | 0.734 | 0.516 | 0.191 | 0.975 | 0.368 | 0.609 |
| RD PM1 | 0.551 | 0.456 | 0.333 | 0.659 | 0.332 | 0.479 | 0.134 | 0.396 |
| RM PM1 | 0.961 | 1.000 | 0.910 | 0.911 | 0.355 | 0.349 | 0.899 | 0.873 |
| F ment | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.942 | 1.000 | 0.967 | 0.977 | 0.977 |
In terms of depth relative to the alveolar margin, the mandibular canal (MC) in Van cats was found to follow a slightly curved, U-shaped course rather than a linear trajectory. Furthermore, the depth of the MC was not uniform along its course, fluctuating in both female and male Van cats (Table 1 and Table 2). Similarly, the height and width of the mandible along the course of the MC were not uniform, exhibiting local increases and decreases (Table 1 and Table 2). The distal root region of the first molar tooth was recorded as the highest point of the mandibular body. Narrowing dorsoventrally at the mesial root of the same tooth, the mandibular body maintained a nearly constant height up to the mesial root of the first premolar tooth, exhibiting a slight elevation in the rostral mental foramen region. The widest point of the mandibular body was located in the mesial root region of the second premolar tooth, whereas the narrowest point was observed in the region corresponding to the mesial root of the first premolar tooth.
Regarding the statistical comparison of the mandibular canal between sexes, canal dimensions, specifically h, w, Fw, Flin, Mh, and Mw, showed no significant differences between female and male Van cats. However, the mandibular canal exhibited distinct sex-related variations along its topographic course (Table 4). Specifically, the distance from the mandibular canal to the ventral border (Bh) was significantly greater in male Van cats, positioning the canal higher relative to female Van cats. Conversely, the depth of the mandibular canal (dep) at the distal root of the first premolar tooth was significantly greater in females.
Table 4. Statistical comparison of mandibular canal measurements according to sex.
| Measurement Areas/References | Female Mean ± SD ( n = 7) (mm) | Male Mean ± SD ( n = 7) (mm) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| RD PM1—Bh (Right) | 1.78 ± 0.37 | 2.38 ± 0.25 | 0.004 ** |
| RD PM1—Bh (Left) | 1.85 ± 0.31 | 2.58 ± 0.46 | 0.005 ** |
| RD PM2—Bh (Right) | 2.05 ± 0.31 | 2.53 ± 0.24 | 0.007 ** |
| RD PM2—Bh (Left) | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 2.60 ± 0.24 | 0.003 ** |
| RM PM1—Bh (Right) | 1.50 ± 0.41 | 2.15 ± 0.40 | 0.011 * |
| RM PM1—Bh (Left) | 1.55 ± 0.47 | 2.38 ± 0.49 | 0.007 ** |
| RD PM1—dep (Right) | 5.85 ± 0.25 | 5.08 ± 074 | 0.033 * |
| RD PM1—dep (Left) | 5.90 ± 0.27 | 5.14 ± 0.89 | 0.043 * |
| All Tooth Regions (h, w, Fw, Flin, Mh, Mw) | Similar Distribution | Similar Distribution | p > 0.05 |
4. Discussion
In this study, the morphometric values of the mandibular canal (MC) in Van cats were determined for the first time using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Diagnostic imaging modalities such as radiography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging are routinely utilized in the anatomical evaluation of the MC [26]. Computed Tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for imaging hard tissues in dentistry due to its measurement accuracy and clear visualization of anatomical boundaries and variations [27]. Furthermore, it serves as a non-invasive, rapid, and highly reliable diagnostic tool with substantial clinical value [26]. In jawbone evaluation, tomographic imaging offers distinct advantages over two-dimensional methods by allowing multiplanar visualization (sagittal, transverse, and dorsal) of topographic relationships and the reconstruction of three-dimensional structures, thereby enhancing surgical planning [28,29]. One of the most critical parameters in the application of CT and CBCT in veterinary dentistry is spatial resolution, which is directly influenced by slice thickness [30,31]. In the present study, acquiring CBCT images at a 0.4 mm voxel size with an 8 × 5 cm mandibular FOV using the CS 9600 system (Carestream Dental LLC, Atlanta, GA, USA) provided adequate spatial resolution for precise morphometric evaluation. This and similar high-resolution protocols enable clear cross-sectional imaging of the MC without structural superimposition from adjacent anatomical structures [27].
In line with the MC diameter (height and width) results obtained in our study, it was determined that the canal height in Van cats followed a cycle of gradual decrease, remaining constant, increasing, and decreasing again along the dental arch, starting from the foramen mandibulare. Furthermore, the MC width in Van cats exhibited slight expansions and narrowings along its course. In this respect, our findings are consistent with those reported by Cotrim et al. (2015) [22] in mixed-breed cats, who similarly observed regional fluctuations in MC height along the dental arch as well as subtle variations in canal width at specific tooth locations. In a study conducted on humans, Scomparim (2013) [32] suggested that these slight fluctuations exhibited by the MC width along its course arise from the anatomical pressure created by the differing root sizes of the premolar and molar teeth. The maximum height (h) and width (w) of the mandibular canal (MC), measured at the level of the mandibular foramen, have significant practical implications for local anesthesia procedures. Knowledge of these dimensions at the mandibular entry point can facilitate effective anesthetic diffusion during tooth extractions and rostral or caudal mandibular interventions, while minimizing the risk of direct needle trauma or intraneural injection. The pronounced structural narrowing and inward shift in the MC observed at the mesial root of the first premolar, followed by its minimum height and width at the rostral foramen mentale junction, represent a high-risk zone during dental procedures. When performing complex extractions of the first premolar or surgical root tip retrieval, clinicians must exercise extreme caution.
When the proximity of the MC pathway to the lingual and vestibular surfaces was examined, it was revealed that the canal in Van cats followed a line close to the lingual surface up to the mesial aspect of the first molar tooth. From this point onward, it progressed centrally though still inclined toward the lingual direction up to the distal aspect of the first premolar tooth, and finally directed toward the vestibular margin from the first premolar tooth toward the rostral foramen mentale to open outward. Accordingly, our results demonstrate similarity to the findings of Cotrim et al. (2015) [22], who likewise reported that the mandibular canal in mixed-breed cats travels closer to the lingual cortical plate in the molar region before shifting toward the vestibular surface as it approaches the rostral foramen mentale. The general trajectory of this course also resembles the canal route in mesocephalic and brachycephalic dogs, where it runs close to the lingual surface in the region of the molar teeth, is subsequently centered between the vestibular and lingual cortices up to the third premolar, and terminates close to the vestibular cortex in the foramen mentale region [10]. Since the canal in Van cats is located closer to the lingual surface throughout most of the length of the mandibular body, it can be argued that it also shares similarities with the topography described in humans [18,19]. From a clinical standpoint, the regional course of the canal close to the medial (lingual) wall at the level of the molar teeth, and its direction from the midline toward the lateral (facial/vestibular) side at the premolar level in Van cats, provide crucial practical guidelines for veterinary dental and maxillofacial interventions. During mandibular fracture fixation (e.g., plate-screw applications), endodontic procedures, complex tooth extractions, or implant surgeries, manipulation of the mandibular body carries an inherent risk of damaging the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle [19]. Our morphometric and statistical comparisons demonstrated that the lateral (facial) bone wall provides a significantly wider safe surgical margin compared to the lingual aspect. Consequently, surgical approaches targeting the lateral surface present a clinically safer trajectory to minimize potential neurovascular trauma during hardware placement or bone manipulation.
The absence of significant bilateral differences in our findings suggests that the topographic orientation of the mandibular canal (MC) in Van cats exhibits relatively stable and symmetrical morphometrics. While functional asymmetries, such as unilateral mastication or localized biomechanical forces, could theoretically influence bone remodeling, our cross-sectional morphometric data did not indicate any lateral bias. However, to definitively conclude that the morphology of the canal is entirely immune to long-term functional adaptation or biomechanical stress, further prospective studies investigating specific clinical variables, including age, sex, body mass, and functional chewing patterns, are warranted. The finding that the parameters of the canal particularly the distance to the ventral border (Bh) and mandibular width (Mw) did not differ significantly between the right and left sides presents a major practical advantage for veterinary surgeons. In cases of mandibular fractures, radiological or morphometric data obtained from the intact side can serve as a reliable reference for surgical planning, such as screw length selection and plate placement, on the damaged contralateral side. Nevertheless, this should not diminish the necessity for further studies aimed at characterizing the MC in other cat breeds with different cephalic biotypes, as suggested by Valarelli et al. (2007) [33]. Indeed, in this breed specific study on Van cats, it should be noted that during premolar and molar surgeries or endodontic procedures in male cats, the canal is located significantly closer to the tooth roots; this proximity may increase the risk of iatrogenic injury or root lesions exerting pressure on the canal. Conversely, when performing inferior alveolar nerve blocks at the level of the mandibular foramen in female cats, the needle insertion point may need to be adjusted relative to the ventral margin of the mandible. These anatomical variations appear to be closely associated with breed characteristics and overall morphological structure. As noted by Martinez et al. (2009) [10], such conditions can primarily be attributed to variations in the general body size of the animals analyzed.
When the depth (dep) of the mandibular canal (MC) was analyzed, our results partially differed from the values reported for mixed-breed cats [22]. In mixed-breed cats, as well as in brachycephalic and mesocephalic dogs, the canal reportedly descends from the mandibular foramen to the mesial root region of the first molar tooth, where it reaches its maximum depth, and displays a linear, smooth ascent toward the rostral mental foramen [22]. In contrast, our findings in Van cats indicate that this path does not follow a simple linear trajectory, as the canal deepens again at the mesial aspect of the first premolar tooth. Martinez et al. (2009) [10] attributed the deepest position of the MC at the mesial aspect of the first molar tooth to the prominent height of its root within the mandibular body. Consequently, it can be hypothesized that the mesial root height of the first premolar tooth in Van cats may be relatively greater than that of the adjacent premolars. Nevertheless, to confirm this potential relationship, future investigations incorporating quantitative correlation analyses between precise MC coordinates and tooth root morphometrics are warranted. Furthermore, the observed vertical fluctuations along the MC trajectory may also be influenced by regional variations in the cortical bone architecture of the mandibular body. Supporting this structural role, Eto et al. (2023) [34] reported that buccal cortical bone thickness and height vary significantly by sex, with females exhibiting thinner cortical bone and reduced bone height relative to the position of the MC. Therefore, evaluating the relationship between these cortical bone variations and the MC alongside fundamental biological variables such as age, sex, body weight, and bilateral symmetry remains an important objective for future studies. The non-linear, U-shaped vertical trajectory of the MC along the mandibular body indicates that the risk of neurovascular involvement varies dynamically along the dental arch. Because the canal deepens at the molar region, rises rostrally, and deepens again at the first premolar tooth, standard linear assumptions of canal depth can lead to intraoperative complications. Surgical stabilization of mandibular body fractures must account for these vertical fluctuations to avoid impinging upon the canal during reduction and hardware engagement. Furthermore, the statistically significant sex-specific variations observed in our study dictate tailored surgical planning; female cats exhibited a significantly greater canal depth (dep) at the distal root of the first premolar tooth. These morphological distinctions suggest that clinicians should adjust drill depth and screw length based on sex when operating on the ventral mandibular border or placing hardware in the rostral premolar region in Van cats.
The primary limitations of this study include the relatively small sample size and the restricted demographic diversity of the study group, as well as the lack of cortical bone thickness measurements. The limited number of animals restricts the direct generalization of the obtained morphometric data to broader feline populations. Furthermore, because all animals evaluated were standardized at 4 years of age and exhibited a narrow body weight range, age-related changes (e.g., in young or geriatric individuals) and body weight-dependent variations in mandibular bone density, cortical thickness, or canal topography could not be evaluated. How marked variations in skull size or body weight influence the millimetric position of the MC remains to be determined in future studies. Finally, although vertical and horizontal canal fluctuations may be linked to regional variations in the ventral and lateral cortical bone, cortical bone thickness was not metrically quantified in the current study.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, this study has revealed the topography of the mandibular canal and sex-dependent morphometric variations in Van cats with millimeter precision. The morphometric reference values obtained from this study will serve as a valuable guide for clinicians to prevent iatrogenic neurovascular damage during dental procedures and regenerative jaw surgeries in Van cats. Furthermore, we believe that the results of this study will pave the way for future large-scale population studies focusing on the mandibular canal, encompassing different cat breeds, age groups, weights, and cortical bone thickness measurements.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
| BW | Body Weight |
| CBCT | Cone-Beam Computed Tomography |
| DICOM | Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine |
| FOV | Field of View |
| i.m. | Intramuscular |
| MC | Mandibular Canal |
| MPR | Multiplanar Reconstruction |
| SPSS | Statistical Package for the Social Sciences |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, V.D. and S.K.; methodology, V.D. and S.K.; software V.D. and S.K.; validation, V.D. and S.K.; formal analysis, V.D. and S.K.; investigation, V.D. and S.K.; resources, V.D.; data curation, V.D. and S.K.; writing—original draft preparation, V.D. and S.K.; writing—review and editing, V.D. and S.K.; visualization, V.D.; supervision, V.D.; project administration, V.D.; funding acquisition, V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was conducted with the review and approval of the Van Yuzuncu Yil University Local Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee, decision number 2026/7-25.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data sets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no external funding.
Footnotes
[内容请查看原文]
References
[内容请查看原文]
Associated Data
Data Availability Statement
The data sets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
兽研